Sybqa

Comparison · Percy

Percy alternative: Sybqa vs BrowserStack Percy

Percy, from BrowserStack, is a visual testing and review product: your tests capture snapshots, Percy compares them with the approved baseline, and your team approves or rejects each change. Sybqa does not use baselines. It works through journeys on a link, checks layout at three widths, runs accessibility rules and reports evidence. If you need to stop unintended visual change across releases, Percy is built for it. If you need a first check of whether a site works, Sybqa is the lighter start.

Facts checked

At a glance

Sybqa and Percy compared on the points both publish
PointSybqaPercy
Core jobChecks a site you point it at and reports evidence of what brokeVisual testing and review: captures snapshots, compares them with previously approved baselines and highlights the differences
Where you startA link and an optional goal. You review the plan before anything runsAdd it to existing Storybook, Playwright or Selenium tests, use its SDKs, or start without code; the docs also describe setup from an AI coding agent
What you get backAn evidence report (HTML, JSON and JUnit) with screenshots and steps to reproduce; blocked and not-run checks are listed, never counted as passedA build of snapshot differences that reviewers approve or request changes on; a Visual Review Agent that highlights meaningful changes
Approved baselinesNone. A run is checked against rules and the journeys in the plan, and compared with the previous run’s findings, not with approved imagesThe centre of the product; the pricing page lists smart baseline management that picks the base build for each comparison
BrowsersA real browser at desktop (1440 px), phone (390 px) and narrow (320 px) widths, with axe-core accessibility checksChrome, Firefox, Edge and Safari are listed on the pricing page, which also lists real mobile browsers as a feature
Scheduled page scansRuns when you or your pipeline start oneThe product menu lists a Website Scanner: add pages by sitemap, schedule recurring scans, scan pages behind authentication
Public pricingA free plan after sign-up (10 runs a month, no AI review) and a paid plan with AI creditsFree: 5,000 screenshots a month. Desktop: $199 a month billed annually. Desktop & Mobile: $599 a month billed annually. Enterprise: by inquiry. A screenshot is one page or component in one browser at one width

What Percy does better

Which one to choose

Choose Percy if

  • You ship often and want every pull request to show what changed visually, with sign-off before merge.
  • You already run Storybook, Playwright or Selenium tests and want screenshots from them.
  • You want a free allowance to start and are prepared to meter usage in screenshots.

Choose Sybqa if

  • You have no test suite and want to know whether a site works, fits on a phone and passes accessibility rules.
  • You want a report with steps to reproduce to hand to a developer or client.
  • You would rather review one plan and read one report than wire snapshots into tests.

For site-wide accessibility scanning from the same vendor, see the BrowserStack Website Scanner comparison.

What this comparison does not claim

Common questions

Is Sybqa a replacement for Percy?

No. Percy compares snapshots with approved baselines across releases. Sybqa checks a site you point it at and reports evidence from that run. A team can use Sybqa for a first read on a new site and add a visual testing tool once there is a design to protect.

How does Percy count screenshots?

BrowserStack’s pricing page says usage is based on screenshots rendered, and that a screenshot is a rendering of a page or component in one browser and responsive width combination.

Sources

Try Sybqa on your site

Paste a link, review the plan, and read the evidence report. The free plan gives 10 runs a month without AI review after you sign up.

Test my site Create a free account