Findings you can check
Each issue links to its screenshot and the measurement behind it.
Website QA for sites built with AI
You built it with Lovable, Bolt, v0 or Cursor. Before you share the link, Sybqa opens it in a real browser, tries signup and login the way a customer would, and shows you what didn’t work.
An animated example. Sybqa’s cursor opens a made-up plant shop called Fernly, clicks Login and lands on a 404 page, checks three AI leads, tries a bad email, then submits a valid one and waits five seconds with no response. The steps are listed as text below.
Tell us which parts matter most, like signup or checkout. You approve the plan before anything runs.
A real browser clicks through your site on desktop and on a phone-sized screen. You can follow each step live.
Every problem comes with a screenshot and steps to reproduce it. Anything we couldn’t test is listed too.
AI flags plenty of things that turn out to be fine. So Sybqa measures each finding in the page first. If the measurement doesn’t support it, it’s dropped. If there’s nothing to measure, you decide.
| The AI said | The browser measured | Result |
|---|---|---|
| “The button text is hard to read.” | 1.5 : 1 contrast | Fail |
| “The badge text is hard to read.” | 7.1 : 1 contrast | Dropped |
| “The password label looks cut off.” | Not measurable | Review |
ChatGPT, Claude and the builders themselves can open your site now. Here’s what you get from each when you want to know whether it works.
| Question | Sybqa | Ask ChatGPT or Claude | Your builder’s own tests |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who checks the work | A separate tester | The same chat that suggests the fixes | The same agent that wrote the code |
| Setup | Paste a link | Turn on a browser agent and write a prompt each time | Built in, and runs when the agent decides to |
| What a finding means | Measured in the page, or dropped | The model’s opinion | Whatever the agent chose to check |
| Signups and payments | Throwaway account and test-mode payment, cleaned up afterwards | You set them up and clean up | Depends on the builder |
| What you keep | A report with screenshots, steps to reproduce, and JSON and JUnit files | A chat transcript | Notes in your build chat |
Each issue links to its screenshot and the measurement behind it.
See every click, network request and check while the test runs.
Sybqa can sign up and pay with your test keys, then refund the payment and delete the account.
Sybqa never needs your code. The free check submits nothing. Paid runs can use a throwaway signup, deleted afterwards.
Checks that don’t use AI are free. You only pay for the AI that looks for possible problems and writes up what it finds.
Free
$0
AI review
$19 / month
Starter includes 500 AI credits a month. A full AI check on a typical site uses about 17 credits, and a large site up to 33, so that’s 15–29 checks. Checks that don’t use AI use no credits.
One check without signing up, and after you sign up, 10 runs a month that don’t use AI. They check links, forms, layout and contrast.
Buy a top-up in Billing: $9 adds 250 credits, about 7–14 checks. Top-up credits roll over while your plan is active. Or wait for your plan to renew.AI review pauses until your plan renews. Runs that don’t use AI still work.
Yes. Cancel anytime in the billing portal. Your run history is kept.
A QA tool for websites and web apps built with AI tools such as Lovable, Bolt, v0 and Cursor. It tests your site in a real browser and tells you what’s broken, with screenshots.
They can click around your site, and that helps. But the agent that wrote your code is grading its own work, and a chat answer is an opinion. Sybqa is a separate tester: it measures every finding in the page and drops what it can’t back up. It uses throwaway signups and test-mode payments and cleans them up afterwards, and it gives you a report with screenshots and steps to reproduce. You paste a link. There’s nothing to set up. See the comparison.
Sybqa never edits your code or settings. The free check only reads your site and submits nothing. Paid runs can submit signup or test forms with throwaway data, and the test account is deleted afterwards. Payments are only tried with your test-mode keys.
Each problem with a screenshot and steps to reproduce it, a list of what couldn’t be tested, and JSON and JUnit files for your CI. Open the sample report.
No. A URL is enough.
Credits measure the AI work in a check. A full AI check uses about 17 on a typical site and up to 33 on a large one. Checks that don’t use AI use none. See pricing.